WE ARE NOT IMPRESSED WITH THIS STRATEGY.
We heard Hillary say which states don’t matter before, but in case we missed it the first time, her chief strategist, Mark Penn, let us know it all over again this past week with this helpful tidbit of a quote:
“Could we possibly have a nominee who hasn’t won any of the significant states — outside of Illinois? That raises some serious questions about Sen. Obama.”
The line of questioning seems to try and imply (among other things) that because Obama didn’t win in New York or California, he won’t be able to win those states in the general election. Strange logic, since these two states will be “blue” states whether or not Hillary is running for office.
However, how long does the Clinton campaign think it can continue insulting the remaining population of the United States by implying their votes / states are insignificant?
- Sorry Alabama, Alaska, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Carolina, Utah, Virginia, and Washington. Oh, and the District of Columbia. Your states don’t matter.
And, exactly how is this considered a winning strategy by the Clinton campaign?
SOURCE: Clinton’s Delegate Tactics